Youngstown School Board’s case against House Bill 70 pushes forward, with the district filing its reply brief to the state Monday.
The appellant reply is the last merit brief filed before oral arguments are scheduled, per the court’s Rules of Practice.
The School Board continues to argue the way the legislation was quickly amended and passed violates the three-reading rule. The state’s Feb. 25 appellees merit brief asserts the assembly complied with the three-reading rule as the amendment did not change the root purpose of the bill, which was to improve underperforming schools.
Youngstown’s reply states the state does not want citizens to see how laws are made or give them time to weigh in.
In its reply, the School Board writes: “The state’s suggestion that the court look only at the final provisions of Am. Sub. HB No. 70 and ignore the enactment procedure would require the court to turn a blind eye to a months-long effort by the Governor’s office and the Ohio Department of Education to secretly draft (HB 70) and have the legislature propose and pass it in one day — the last day of the legislative session, so that there would be only a tightly restricted, one-day opportunity for debate or public input on the legislation.”
The reply argues the three-reading rule is not dependent on the one-subject rule — which states bills cannot contain legislation with “no discernable, practical, rational or legitimate reasons for combining the provisions into one act.” The amendment to House Bill 70 added provisions for Academic Distress Commissions to a bill originally creating community learning centers and “vitally altered” the bill, triggering the three-reading rule, according to the latest brief.
The reply argues the appointment of a CEO with control of a district violates the Ohio Constitution by usurping power from the locally elected school board.
“If this court adopts the State’s argument and holds that school boards retain some power, despite the sweeping language of (HB 70), endless litigation will ensue and the courts will be left to divine what those powers are. This will entangle school boards and chief executive officers in costly and time-consuming litigation — certainly not a result the General Assembly intended when it gave chief executive officers ‘complete operational, managerial and instructional control’ over a school district.”
Accepted by the Ohio Supreme Court in October, the outcome of Youngstown’s appeal would set precedent for Lorain and East Cleveland, which also are under state takeover. Both districts’ school boards and other associations have submitted “friend of the court” briefs in support of Youngstown School Board’s case.
- Academic Distress Commission member calls for CEO resignation, chairman discusses evaluation (UPDATED, VIDEO)
- Moratorium possible on state takeovers under House Bill 70
- Oral arguments set in House Bill 70 case before Ohio Supreme Court
- Confronting Hate conference panel debates effects of HB 70
- Lorain, Youngstown and East Cleveland school boards discuss House Bill 70 (VIDEO)
- Lorain teacher, union head testify against House Bill 70
- Lorain ADC chair blocks parent, parent group on Twitter
- Ohio mayors talk gas tax, House Bill 70
- Local legislators discuss House Bill 70
- State superintendent says state takeovers of schools need to change
- Lorain school board member Tony Dimacchia among witnesses in House Bill 70 lawsuit
- Lorain's Democratic party passes resolution calling for end of HB 70
- Sen. Nathan Manning announces bill to help Lorain Schools (UPDATED)
- Lorain Schools: teachers union, CEO approved calendars don't align
- State Superintendent says House Bill 70 creates "challenging circumstances" (VIDEO)
- State reps move to stop House Bill 70
- Discussion examines the relationship of poverty, funding and student achievement
- Proposal aims to weaken House Bill 70
- County Commissioners Board urges state to leave House Bill 70 (UPDATED)
- Lorain unions join teachers for rally against House Bill 70 (VIDEO)
- Nathan Manning questions state superintendent on House Bill 70
- Ritenauer says Lorain's on the rebound in state of the city speech
- Commission chair appointment doesn't sit well with Lorain Schools
- State defends school takeover law in Ohio Supreme Court case
- School board declares emergency, citing lack of progress with CEO David Hardy (VIDEO)
- Lorain High School: Teachers won't reapply for jobs (UPDATED, VIDEO)
- DeWine says he is open to reviewing House Bill 70
- No confidence in CEO Hardy from Lorain teachers
- Lorain School Board president seeks House Bill 70 removal
- Lorain Schools CEO declines joint meeting
- East Cleveland school board's lawsuit against state takeover moves forward
- Race again becomes topic at Lorain Schools meeting (VIDEO)
- More districts join lawsuit against House Bill 70
- Lorain teachers union files brief in HB 70 lawsuit
- Ohio Supreme Court takes House Bill 70 appeal